Los Angeles Times: Scientist says some pollution is good for you — a disputed claim Trump’s EPA has embraced

/, Media Coverage, Milloy, Regulatory Reform/Los Angeles Times: Scientist says some pollution is good for you — a disputed claim Trump’s EPA has embraced

by Susanne Rust
Los Angeles Times

In early 2018, a deputy assistant administrator in the EPA, Clint Woods, reached out to a Massachusetts toxicologist best known for pushing a public health standard suggesting that low levels of toxic chemicals and radiation are good for people.

“I wanted to check to see if you might have some time in the next couple of days for a quick call to discuss a couple items …,” Woods wrote to Ed Calabrese…

Less than two weeks later, Calabrese’s suggestions on how the EPA should assess toxic chemicals and radiation were introduced, nearly word for word, in the U.S. government’s official journal, the Federal Register.

“This is a major big time victory,” Calabrese wrote in an email to [E&E Legal Senior Policy Fellow and Junkscience.com founder] Steve Milloy…

“Yes. It is YUGE!” wrote Milloy, in response.

Read more.

2019-03-01T11:02:33+00:00February 19th, 2019|"Scare Pollution", Media Coverage, Milloy, Regulatory Reform|